Feminist Majority Foundation: working for women's equality
Feminist News
Feminist Career Center
Take Action Online
Special Features
Feminist Calendar
Feminist Online Store
Feminist E-Mail Alerts
Donate to the Feminist Majority
Help Afghan Women
Sister Site: www.FeministCampus.org
Reproductive Rights
Women & Policing
Global Feminism
Emergency Resources for Women
Breast Cancer Center
Women & Girls in Sports
Feminist Research Center
Arts & Entertainment
Feminist Site Reviews
About FMF
Donate to the Feminist Majority Foundation
FMF Campaigns & Projects
For the Press
 

NATIONAL WOMEN'S EQUALITY ACT
for the 21st Century

Sponsored by the National Council of Women's Organizations,
A bipartisan network of leaders from over 100 organizations
representing more than six million women.


Prepared by Eleanor Smeal and Jennifer Jackman Ph.D. of the Feminist Majority for the National Council of Women's Organizations with extensive consultation from Nancy Zirkin of American Association for University Women; Heidi Hartmann Ph.D. of the Institute for Women's Policy Research; Martha Burk Ph.D. of the Center for Advancement of Public Policy; Susan Bianchi-Sand of the National Committee on Pay Equity; Gail Shaffer of the Business and Professional Women USA; National Organization for Women; Anita Perez Ferguson of the National Women's Political Caucus; NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund; Black Women's Agenda; Professor Ronnie J. Steinberg of Vanderbilt University; Coalition of Labor Union Women; Clearinghouse on Women's Issues; Organization of Chinese American Women; Women's Action for New Directions; National Women's Conference; Women's Institute for Freedom of the Press; National Women's Party; Alexandria Commission for Women; Jewish Women's Coalition; National Association for Women in Education; Forum '98; and National Convention of Commissions for Women.

Draft 7/28/98


National Women's Equality Act
for the 21stCentury

I. Preamble
II.Guiding Principles

1. Equality for Women and Girls in Education

2. Equality for Women in Employment

3. Equality for Women in Taxation

4. Equality for Women in Retirement Security

5. Equality for Women in Health Care

6. Equal Access to Media for Women

7. Equality for Women in the Judicial System

8. Equality for Women in Family Care Responsibilities

III. End Notes

Preamble

In 1848, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott, together with some 300 women and men, convened the first women's rights convention in the history of the United States and the world in Seneca Falls. At that time, men did not allow women to vote, own property, keep their own wages, or win custody of their children. They deprived married women of all civil rights and subjected single women to taxation without representation. They barred women from colleges and denied women all opportunity to practice law or medicine, or to become teachers or theologians. Driven by these grievances, the First Women's Rights Convention issued a Declaration of Human Sentiments and 11 resolutions demanding full equality for women and an end to the tyranny of men over women. Among the most radical of demands was recognition of women's right to vote.

The 1848 Declaration of Human Sentiments concluded, "We insist that [women] have all the rights and privileges which belong to them as citizens of these United States." Since then women have campaigned tirelessly for equality.

In 1923, during the 75th anniversary ceremonies of the historic First Women's Rights Convention, Alice Paul proposed the following Lucretia Mott amendment to the U.S. Constitution: "Men and women shall have equal rights throughout the United States and every place subject to its jurisdiction." This was the precursor to the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), also authored by Alice Paul and first introduced in Congress in 1943, which read, "Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex." Seventy-five years after the introduction of an Equal Rights Amendment, women are still denied a guarantee of equality under the United States Constitution.

And, in 1998, one hundred and fifty years after Seneca Falls, women still do not have equal representation. Women comprise a mere 12.3% of the members of Congress, and hold only three governorships. No woman has ever served as President, Vice President, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Majority Leader of the United States Senate -- rarely even as a full committee chair of either body of Congress.

Today, we reaffirm our commitment to Constitutional equality for women and girls and to women's full participation in the decision-making bodies of our nation. And we do more. We participate in and advance a global movement for women and demand that the United States join the overwhelming majority of nations of the world in ratifying the United Nation's Convention to Eliminate All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) without reservations, declarations, or understandings that weaken this commitment.

When our suffragist foremothers were frustrated in their federal constitutional fight to win suffrage, they passed state laws and constitutional amendments to gain the right to vote state by state. They leveraged their power and worked on multiple fronts gaining women's educational rights, property rights and the right to keep their own wages. So too have modern-day feminists fought to pass state ERAs, state and federal statutory guarantees to end discrimination in employment and education, to provide equal access to credit, to end pregnancy discrimination, and to stop violence against women among other areas. We have lobbied, litigated, picketed, marched, petitioned, engaged in civil disobedience, and boycotted to win women's rights.

Women of today still have not gained full political, legal, economic, social, and educational equality. We demand that the Congress and the United States of America ensure equality for all women -- regardless of race, class, sexual orientation, ethnicity, disability, marital status, or age -- in all spheres of life, including employment, education, retirement security, health care, and care-giving and family responsibility, as well as all citizen responsibilities, benefits and privileges. To secure these rights, as we fight for a constitutional guarantee of equality for women and as we commemorate this 150th anniversary of Seneca Falls, we advance the National Women's Equality Act for the 21stCentury.

Guiding Principles

Equality for Women and Girls in Education

Despite advances for women and girls in education, including athletics, under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, equality for women and girls in education has not yet been achieved. Women faculty are less likely to receive tenure: in 1992-1993, the majority of men faculty (68.9%) at four year colleges and universities had tenure, compared with only 44.1% of women.1 Female students remain significantly under-represented in the fields of engineering, computer science, and physical sciences. For example, in 1994, women received only 28% of computer science bachelor's degrees, 26% of master's, and 15% of doctoral degrees.2 In engineering, women received only 15% of bachelor's degrees, 15% of master's degrees, and 11% of doctoral degrees in 1994. Fewer dollars are spend on female student athletes. 3 Female intercollegiate athletes receive only 23% of athletic budgets and 38% of athletic scholarship dollars. 4

In addition, gender harassment, sexual harassment by students and faculty, and sexual assault at middle schools, high schools, and colleges are pervasive and limit the aspirations of women and girls. Tolerance of these acts by school officials serves to diminish the status of women and girls.

Recent court decisions have made clear the reality that protections of the rights of women and girls under Title IX are weaker than prohibitions against employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

To end discrimination against women and girls in education, the Women's Equality Act will:

  • Prohibit all forms of sex discrimination in education, including sexual harassment.
  • Require educational institutions and their agents to assure non-discrimination in all educational institutions, including prohibition of sexual harassment, and to assume vicarious liability.
  • Prohibit systemic practices that result in gender-based inequalities in educational institutions and fields of academic study, and require educational practices, policies, and procedures such as affirmative action which produce equality for women and girls in education.
  • Increase funding for gender equality under the Women's Equity in Education Act and vocational education programs.
  • Increase effectiveness of state-level Title IX coordinators by providing national resources.
  • Require educational institutions at all levels to disclose statistics by sex and by race including class enrollment by discipline and athletic participation, and make this information publicly available.
  • Require teacher-training institutions to incorporate gender issues in their curriculum.
  • Require U.S. Department of Education to submit an annual report to Congress detailing by sex and race the disbursement of financial aid, loans and grants, and awards in higher education, and its enforcement of Title IX.

    Equality for Women in Employment

    Elimination of Wage Discrimination

    Occupational segregation and sex bias in wage-setting have produced a persistent wage gap between men and women workers. In 1997, women on average were paid 76 cents for every dollar paid to men -- African American women 63 cents and Hispanic women 56 cents. 5 Women remain clustered in low-paying jobs. Women comprise 98.5% of secretaries and 78.3% of cashiers, but only 2.1% of firefighters and 2.5% of construction workers. 6 Sex discrimination continues to limit women's advancement and overall economic well-being.

    Current federal equal pay laws suffer from under-enforcement and do not guarantee pay equity for work involving similar levels of skill, effort, responsibility and working conditions. Traditional job evaluation systems ignore, undervalue, or negatively value work performed by women.

    If these inequities are not corrected, over her lifetime, the average working woman will lose about $523,000 due to lost wages and retirement benefits. 7

    To eliminate wage discrimination and achieve pay equity, the Women's Equality Act will:

  • Prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, race, or national origin for work in equivalent jobs.
  • Require employers to disclose wage statistics by sex and by race and make this information publicly available.
  • Protect workers from retaliation for discussing and organizing around equal pay issues.
  • Require modification of existing job evaluation, classification and compensation systems to achieve gender neutrality in wage-setting.

    To create the conditions for labor market equality, the Women's Equality Act will:

  • Support affirmative action in employment and public contracting.
  • Prohibit systemic practices which result in gender-based inequalities in employment and require practices, policies, and procedures which produce equality for women in employment.
  • Prohibit employment discrimination against lesbians and gay men.
  • Require employers to pro-rate benefits for part-time workers.

    Remove Obstacles to Legal Remedies for Sex Discrimination in Employment

    With passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, women gained the right to a jury trial and compensatory and punitive damages in sex discrimination in employment cases. However, a 180 day statute of limitations inhibits the ability of women to file sex discrimination claims. Moreover, unlike race discrimination cases, sex discrimination suits face caps on the level of damages that can be awarded.

    To improve enforcement of existing equal employment laws, the Women's Equality Act seeks to:

  • Remove cap on punitive and compensatory damages.
  • Extend statute of limitations from 180 days.
  • Strengthen enforcement of equal employment laws and increase funding for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Office of Federal Contract Compliance for this purpose.

    End Discrimination in the Military

    In 1994, the Clinton Administration opened a quarter million combat-related jobs to women. However, women remain excluded from 39% of positions in the armed forces. 8 These jobs are often higher paying, receive better benefits, and lead to promotions. Women in the armed forces are currently serving in capacities no less risky than combat positions, but they are denied the advantages these positions confer.

    To remove obstacles to women in military employment, the Women's Equality Act will:

  • Allow women to serve in all positions in the armed forces for which they are otherwise eligible.
  • Require sex integration in training in all branches of the armed forces.
  • Enforce sexual harassment, domestic violence, and sexual assault laws in the military at least as well as they are enforced for the civilian population.
  • Prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation which is used disproportionately to exclude and penalize women in the armed services. 8

    Equality for Women in Taxation

    Sex discrimination in the federal tax system contributes to the economic marginalization of women. It discriminates against almost all women: married and single, rich, poor and middle class.

    The current tax structure divides two income married households into a primary earner (usually he who makes more) and a secondary earner (usually she who makes less). The system penalizes many working women by placing an extra tax burden on the secondary earner in a family. Moreover, the system creates a tax liability for homemakers without establishing real property rights for women. Income and filing are considered joint for tax purposes, but not for non-tax purposes such as property distribution in divorce.

    To end tax practices that penalize women, the Women's Equality Act will:

  • Prohibit sex discrimination in taxation.
  • Eliminate biases against the spouse who receives less pay in a married, two-wage earner couple.
  • Improve and expand tax benefits for child care.

    To end the funding of entities domestically and abroad which discriminate on the basis of sex, the Women's Equality Act will:

  • Prohibit the distribution of tax dollars and benefits to institutions that discriminate against women.
  • Make the treatment of women and girls and the recognition of their human rights a paramount consideration in the distribution of foreign aid and assistance.

    Equality for Women in Retirement Security

    End Disadvantages to Women in Social Security

    Social security, which initially was established to be a supplemental program, has become the major and often the only source of retirement income for women. Older women are more dependent than men on social security for their economic survival. Sixty-two percent of retired women overall do not receive employer-provided pensions and therefore rely on social security as their major source of income. 9 Social security keeps millions of women out of poverty.

    However, the social security system is based on demographics of marriage and work patterns which have changed and produces outcomes unfavorable to many women. For example, leaving the labor force to provide care to children or elderly parents dramatically lowers women's lifetime average earnings and, in turn, their social security benefit payouts. In addition, wage discrimination against women in the labor market further contributes to women worker's lower social security benefits and often poverty for elderly women. As a result of these multiple factors, retired women workers receive an average of $621 in monthly benefits compared with retired men workers who receive an average of $810 per month. 10

    The social security system, however, does try to reduce some income disparities. Even though lower earners, who are disproportionately female, pay social security taxes on all of their earnings while higher earners pay social security taxes on only the first $68,400, lower income workers are benefited by the payout schedule which reduces the disparity between high and low wage earners by replacing a larger percentage of the earnings of low wage earners and sets both minimum and maximum benefit levels.

    To eliminate the unfair treatment of women in social security and to enhance the economic security of older women, the Women's Equality Act will:

  • End policies and practices that disproportionately disadvantage women in the social security system.
  • Ensure that any proposed reform of social security, including privatization proposals, does not disproportionately disadvantage women.
  • Establish earning sharing allocating 50% of both spouses' earnings to each spouse.
  • Credit, rather than penalize, individuals providing full-time child care or elderly care.
  • Change distribution of spousal and primary earner benefit to 75% of total benefit for spouse and 75% of total benefit for primary earner. Currently, the primary earner receives 100% and the spouse 50%.
  • Raise the cap on social security taxes in order to remove the additional tax burden on secondary wage earners.

    End Discrimination in Pensions

    Pension coverage for women is inadequate and unequal. Over half of full-time working women in the private sector lack pension coverage. Women receive half as much in pension benefits as men. 11 In 1994, the median pension benefit for women who received private pensions was $4,200, compared to $7,800 for men. 12

    To end the sex discrimination against women in pensions that contributes to the impoverishment of elderly women, the Women's Equality Act will:

  • Lower vesting requirements to enable more women to qualify for pension coverage.
  • Require pension coverage of additional part-time and contingent workers by lowering the number of annual work hours required to participate.
  • Improve cost of living adjustments and portability provisions in defined benefit plans.
  • Require that accrued pension assets be equally divided in the event of marital dissolution.
  • Entitle widows, widowers, and former spouses to deferred annuities of deceased participants under federal retirement systems.
  • Require spousal consent for distribution of funds from all retirement plans.

    Equality for Women in Health Care

    Medicare and Medicaid

    Substantial sex bias exists in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement for female-specific medical procedures. Women constitute 57% of Medicare recipients and 58.5% of the adult recipients of Medicaid. 13 Some studies calculate that Medicare and Medicaid reimburse only 60% of obstetrics and gynecology practice expenses compared with 91% of urology practice expenses. 14

    To place equal value on health care for women and men, the Women's Equality Act would:

  • Prohibit sex-based discrimination in the inclusion and in the valuing of medical procedures for Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement, including reproductive health care for women and men.
  • Require equal coverage of gender-specific prescription drugs.

    Clinical Trials

    Exclusion or under-representation of women overall and of women of child-bearing age in clinical trials produces diagnosis and treatment patterns that may adversely affect women's health.

    To enable the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and conditions that affect women and men, the Women's Equality Act will:

  • Require the inclusion and representation of women in health research and clinical trials.

    Insurance

    Women of child-bearing age are frequently forced to pay higher premiums on the basis of potential pregnancy. Moreover, many health insurers do not adequately cover illnesses and conditions specific to women. Women of reproductive age spend 68% more than men on out-of-pocket health care costs. 15 Contraceptives and reproductive health care account for much of this difference.

    To eliminate sex discrimination in health insurance coverage, the Women's Equality Act will:

  • Prohibit sex discrimination in health insurance, including reproductive health care for women and men.
  • Require all group health insurance and health insurers to cover prescription contraceptive drugs and devices if such plans provide benefits for other outpatient prescription drugs and devices, such as Viagra.

    Equal Access to Media for Women

    Since the late 1960s, the women's movement has filed lawsuits, held sit-ins, challenged radio and television licenses, and organized protests to increase the representation of women in the media and to decrease the stereotyping of women and girls. We have worked to create more on-air positions for women, to improve the treatment of women in programming, and to promote more ownership of the media by women.

    Despite these efforts, women continue to be grossly under-represented in the media, stereotyping persists, and media ownership remains in the hands of men. Women make up only 8% of the management staffs of newspapers, 16 and less than one fourth of television and radio news directors are women. 17 Men comprise 89% of the guests on the popular television program, Nightline. 18 Eighty-five percent of the regular commentators on the mostly government-funded National Public Radio are men. 19

    To ensure women equal access to airways for communication and for educating the public to issues concerning women, the Women's Equality Act will:

  • Restore Fairness Doctrine which provides equal media time access in keeping with the original Federal Communications Act of 1934 mandating broadcasters to operate in the public interest.
  • Require enforcement of equal opportunity employment practices, non-discriminatory licensing of broadcast ownership properties, and diversity in programming.
  • Ensure equal access and opportunities for women in new technologies, including telecommunications, the internet, and other emerging communications systems.

    Equality for Women in the Justice System

    Women have been denied equality under the law by the judicial system's consistent refusal to hold sex discrimination to as high a standard of scrutiny as other forms of discrimination under the Fourteen Amendment. No where is this denial of equal protection and due process more stark than in the criminal justice system.

    Bias against women both as offenders and as the victims of crimes in the federal and state court systems is well-documented. The interests of women are consistently found to be ignored or overvalued.

    Female offenders receive disproportionately longer sentences for the same crimes, are incarcerated in inferior facilities and facilities that are further away from their families, face sexual assault and sexual harassment from correctional officials, have access to fewer educational and training programs than men and boys, and often are denied routine gynecological care.

    In a society of male-dominance and control, women have been, and are, the more likely victims of violence. Women are 5 to 8 times more likely than men to experience violence by an intimate, 20 which includes physical assaults, harassment, stalking, and psychological/mental abuse. Although women of all races are equally vulnerable to intimate violence, the intersection of race and class creates a particular vulnerability for women who are Black or Hispanic, in younger age groups, never married, with lower family incomes, lower education levels, and in central cities. 21

    Intimate violence also impacts women at the workplace. Harassment at work, including stalking and telephone harassment, are common efforts by batterers to prevent their victims from working. 22 Ongoing abuse and recovery from physical and sexual assault can impact productivity, increase lateness and absenteeism. Recent surveys reveal that over 50% of abused women missed work because of abuse, 23 that at least 60% of abused women reported being late for work due to abuse, 24 and that 70% reported difficulty in performing their job because of abuse. 25 Even Congress recognized that over 50% of rape victims lost their jobs in the aftermath of the crime. 26

    Yet crimes against women are treated less seriously than crimes against men and property. For example, only half of all forcible rapes resulted in an arrest in 1995. 20 And one study reported that 23% of women who decline from reporting rape did so because they believed that the police would be inefficient, ineffective or insensitive. 21

    There are many social and systemic problems that compound violence against women--insufficient access to protection due to inadequate responses by law enforcement, gender bias in the courts, and limited support services.

    The under-representation of women in policing contributes to poor police response to domestic violence and sexual assault. In 1997, women comprised only 13.6% of all sworn officer positions and only 6.5% of top command positions, 9.2% of supervisory positions, and 14.6% of line operation positions. 22 Numerous studies document that women officers respond more effectively to domestic violence calls and are less likely to engage in police brutality.

    To remove bias against women in the justice system, the Women's Equality Act will:

  • Eliminate sex discrimination in the arrest, prosecution, conviction, sentencing, and incarceration of women and girl offenders. Provide programs, facilities, and health care to women in prison equal to those provided to men prisoners.
  • Make federal funds to state and local law enforcement agencies contingent on their achievement of gender balance in their ranks.
  • Require the Uniform Crime Reporting Program to collect annual data on domestic violence and other forms of violence against women.
  • Improve enforcement of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 and the Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 1998, which allows prosecution of violent crimes motivated by gender, as well as other bias crimes not currently covered by federal law.
  • Create a federal cause of action against employers who discriminate against women victims of domestic violence, stalking, and/or sexual assault based on their status as victims of these crimes.
  • Enforce the civil rights remedy of the Violence Against Women Act.

    Equality for Women in Family Care Responsibilities

    Historically, women have born a disproportionate share of the care of children, ill family members, and the elderly, as well as of the home and household tasks. Men's responsibility for family care must be increased and societal supports for family care must be enhanced in order to improve women's ability to participate in economic and civic life beyond the family. Society would benefit from women's experiences and talents. Moreover, families would benefit from the participation of both female and male members in household and care-giving responsibilities.

    To encourage equal responsibility and societal support for care-giving and to allow women full participation in American society, the Women's Equality Act will:

  • Extend coverage of and establish paid leave under the Family Medical Leave Act.
  • Provide access to affordable, quality child care.
  • Create incentives that facilitate equal responsibility for both women and men in care-giving.
  • Strengthen child support awards and collection.



    1Cynthia Costello and Barbara Kivimae Krimgold, eds., The American Woman 1996-97 (New York: W.W.Norton & Company, 1996), 280.
    2National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education, Title IX at 25: Report Card on Gender Equity (Washington, DC: National Women's Law Center, 1997), 29.
    3National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education, Title IX at 25: Report Card on Gender Equity (Washington, DC: National Women's Law Center, 1997), 30.
    4National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education, Title IX at 25: Report Card on Gender Equity (Washington, DC: National Women's Law Center, 1997), 11.
    5U.S. Department of Labor, Labor Force Statistics taken from the Current Population Survey, 1998.
    6Women's Bureau, 20 Leading Occupations of Employed Women, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1977.
    7Heidi Hartmann and Julie Whittaker, The Male-Female Wage Gap: Lifetime Earnings Losses, Institute for Women's Policy Research Briefing Paper, (March 1998).
    8Jake Willens, Women in the Military: Combat Roles Considered, August 7, 1996 citing, General Accounting Office Report NSIAD-96-169, Physically Demanding Jobs - Services Have Little Data on Ability of Personnel To Perform, July 1996.
    9Michelle M. Benecke, Esq., Testimony of Michelle M. Benecke, Esq., Co-Director, Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (Washington, D.C.: Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, June 17, 1997).
    10Institute for Women's Policy Research-In-Brief, Social Security Reform: A Fact Sheet, June 1998.
    11Social Security Administration, Fast Facts and Figures About Social Security, (Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1996), 20.
    12Cynthia Costello, Ph.D., Women, Work, and Pensions: Improving the Odds for a Secure Retirement, (Washington DC: Older Women's League, 1998), 4.
    13Cynthia Costello, Ph.D., Women, Work, and Pensions: Improving the Odds for a Secure Retirement, (Washington DC: Older Women's League, 1998), 4.
    14U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Care Financing Administrations' 1997 Data Compendium, March 1997.
    15Barbara A. Goff, M.D., Howard G. Muntz, M.D. and Joanna M. Cain, M.D., "Is Adam Worth More Then Eve?" Gynecologic Oncology 64 (1997): 372-377, citing William C. Hsiao, Ph.D., 16Daniel L. Dunn, Ph.D. and Diana K. Verrilli, M.S., "Assessing the Implementation of Physician-Payment Reform," New England Journal of Medicine 328 (April 1993): 928-933.
    17Betty Dooley, Women's Health Care Costs and Experiences (Washington, D.C.: Women's Research and Education Instiute, 1994).
    18Newspaper Association of America Survey, 1994. Women, Men and Report, 1995.
    19Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, Extra!, July/August 1998, 11.
    20Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, Extra!, July/August 1998, 11.
    21Lawrence A. Greenfeld et al., United States Department of Justice, Violence by Intimates: Analysis of Data on Crimes by Current or Former Spouses, Boyfriends, and Girlfriends, 4 (1997).
    22Ronet Bachman and Linda E. Saltzman, United States Department of Justice, Violence Against Women: Estimates from the Redesign Survey, 1 (1995).
    23Jody Raphael, "Prisoners of Abuse: Domestic Violence and Welfare Receipt" (Taylor Institute 1996) at 8.
    24Connie Stanley, "Domestic Violence: An Occupational Impact Study," Tulsa, Oklahoma (July 27, 1992) at 17.
    25Melanie Shepard & Ellen Pence, "The Effect of Battering on the Employment Status of Women," 3 Affilia 55, 58 (1988); see also Louise Laurence & Roberta Spalter-Roth, "Measuring the Costs of Domestic Violence Against Women and the Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions" 25 (IWPR, Victims' Services, & the Domestic Violence Training Project, May, 1996).
    26Stanley at 17.
    27S. Rep. No. 138, 103rd Cong., 2d Sess. 54, n.69 (1993), citing E. Ellis, B. Atkeson and K. Calhoun, An Assessment of the Long Term Reaction to Rape, 50 J. Abnormal Psychology No. 3, 264 (1981).
    28Lawrence A. Greenfield, Sex Offenses and Offenders: An Analysis of Data on Rape and Sexual Assault, Bureau of Justice Statistics, February 1997.
    29Catherine Wolf Harlow, Female Victims of Violent Crime, (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 1991).
    30National Center for Women & Policing, Equality Denied: The Status of Women in Policing, 1998.

  • Navigate Options

    Copyright 2000, The Feminist Majority Foundation and New Media Publishing Inc.
       


    Donate
    | About Us | Search | Shop | Home

    © Copyright 2007, Feminist Majority Foundation